With reference to India, consider the following statements:1. Government law officers and legal firms are recognised as advocates, but corporate lawyers and patent attorneys are excluded from recognition as advocates.2. Bar Councils have the power to lay down the rules relating to legal education and recognition of law colleges.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
✓ Correct answer: b) 2 only
ExplanationStatement 1 is incorrect: The term “advocate” under the Advocates Act, 1961 refers to a person who has been enrolled as an advocate in the state Bar Council and is authorized to practice law in courts.Corporate lawyers and patent attorneys, however, are not excluded from recognition as advocates.Corporate lawyers often practice in corporate law firms, while patent attorneys handle intellectual property law.Statement 2 is correct: The Bar Council of India is responsible for overseeing legal education, setting standards for law colleges, and recognizing institutions that offer law degrees.This power extends to setting norms and conditions for legal education to meet the standards required to practice law in India.SUPER HINT For S1, Spot the trap: It plays on the term “recognised as advocates”, trying to split legal professionals into arbi- trary buckets.The nature of work or job title (e.g., gov- ernment counsel, corporate lawyer, patent attorney) is not what determines “advocate” status — what matters is Bar enrollment.Hence likely false.213
Practice more Polity PYQs
Attempt a free 10-question quiz or browse the full Polity & Governance previous-year-question bank with instant answers and explanations.
⚖️ Polity PYQs →